Losing My Religion (3 of 5)

Image from istockphoto.com

I have an interest in Astrology, which some consider as science but others see as gobbledygook. Scorpios are supposed to have inclination toward the esoteric and the occult.

Being a proud Scorpio, I can confirm that I, for one, was very curious about life’s secrets and mysteries, and had a strong desire to understand the nature of our existence and to know if there is such a thing as the ultimate truth.

However, for a long time I didn’t dare approach the metaphorical door and venture into the unknown, mysterious world of our existence because of fear, fear induced by my Catholic/ Christian upbringing. The fear of being sent to eternal damnation if one delves into the occult or, at least for me, delve into the mysterious, through countless books and magazines, pre-internet.

Until about two decades ago, when I found myself at a friend’s place in Mascot, Sydney, sitting next to a cabinet full of books on metaphysics. Yes, these physical objects, within my easy reach, beckoned to me and became my passport to delving beyond the physical.

Finally giving in to this long-suppressed interest, out on a limb, I leafed through one. That one small book became the catalyst in my breaking free of fear of the unknown and into the world of mind-expanding, awe-inducing, limitless possibilities.

With nervous excitement, my passion for reading books was rekindled. Moving from one author to the next, I scoured the libraries in Liverpool, North Sydney and Crows Nest.

I gobbled up books based on opinions, assumptions, logic, first-hand experiences or purported-experiences, philosophies and other thoughts, and travelled with various authors of different nationalities at various times through different places, planets, galaxies, universes, realities and dimensions.

One of those travels was right here on Earth and became my reason number:

2. Reading about the mysterious death of Pope John Paul 1 and the subsequent findings of the author into the Pope’s death affected and disturbed me.

David Yallop’s ‘In the Name of God’ is an eye-opening account of the vast network, power and financial clout of this church of 1.16 billion. Most of it is maybe not news to some but, at that time, it was to me.

Image 'borrowed' from the net

Pope John Paul 1, real name Albino Luciani, by all accounts, was a simple, humble, kind, humorous, intelligent man. Qualities I hold dear. God knows how the tide of history would have turned out if he was allowed by God (or by man?) to continue his role as Pope. The author’s numerous interviews with people who knew and had close contact with the Pope also reveal him to be a pro-poor, incorruptible, down-to-earth man.

This Pope, when once a Patriarch, would rather visit prisons or the sick than attend cocktail parties and receptions. He shunned wealth and extravagance and he, controversially, was open to allowing the use of birth control.

Surrounded by poverty all his life and experiencing it first-hand, he had emphathy for the poor, the difficulty they experience daily in trying to feed mouths they can’t afford to feed. He was suspected to be on the verge of implementing revolutionary changes in the church hierarchy, however, just a month into his papacy, a day before he was due to introduce these courageous changes, he suddenly died.

The author asserts the Pope was poisoned. The Vatican of course denies the allegations and had commissioned another book author to present their versions of events. No autopsy was apparently ever conducted.

The Pope’s untimely demise was very saddening and a great disappointment. I’ve wondered what could have happened if he was able to live long enough to implement his purported radical changes.

David Yallop’s allegations might turn out to be seriously flawed, but who can dispute how seriously powerful and wealthy the Vatican is? To be fair, it’s not only the Catholic church which has accumulated large wealth. Other major Christian denominations, other major religions, and even other relatively new religions are reportedly very wealthy as well.

Why did this event affect my judgment about religion? I had this fairytale idea that religion is beyond politics, that houses of God are beyond corruption. These days, being older, wiser (I hope), more aware, with unprecedented access to a wide array of information (provided we try to discern factual information from the useless information or outright lies), we have a better idea of what goes on in this world.

* * *

However, in trying to get a glimpse of the truths of the various religious beliefs, on which one is right and whose path is the most correct, I dove into more and more books and thought more and more about life and the metaphysical side of things.

One thing that became apparent from all my armchair adventures is that the going isn’t going to be easy. You will get confused… very confused. Just when you think you thought you found the one right path, doubts seep in. And when you’d think you’re finally going somewhere, you see yourself end up being at the same place where you started. You’ll hear conflicting ideas or claims or assertions that contradict what others say.

Only attempt to step into this deep and dark void if you have the mental stamina. For a long time, I was discontented and unsatisfied with the information I was getting. There was a gaping hole I desperately wanted to fill. But I didn’t give up. The more I got confused, the more I tried to know some more. The more I got dissatisfied, the more I tried to search further.

If you are wondering and still searching like I once was, go, search and explore.. You may find what you are seeking, but arm yourself with the sure knowledge that it will get very perplexing and disheartening before things become clear and sure.

That is, if you ever get there. (To be continued…)


As always, your comments are welcome and appreciated.

Next topic: The Heart of the Matter


About Earthianne

A lover of OSHO, truth, freedom, music, non-fiction books, fun and laughter, yoga, animals and world peace. A thinking/conscious man's woman! 😁

Posted on 18/06/2010, in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 8 Comments.

  1. I would like to share with you a simple tip when writing or posting publications/articles into the Internet. This is about the use of the apostrophe, the one that is being used to identify possessive nouns or pronouns. Example: it’s or bucoy’s. The proper way to make this apostrophe not screw up the word it is in, is to make make it or do it or enter it or type it twice, double entry in other words. So by the example given above it would become like this: it”s or bucoy”s. While reading your latest article, I found a lot of apostrophes and they distorted each word whenever used. Happy writing and keep inspiring others. The article was Very interesting, that was.


  2. “I have an interest in Astrology, which some consider as science but others see as gobbledygook.”

    Hey, I’m really into that stuff too. That’s great. By the way I’m a Sagittarius. I’m now also interested in Enneagram, anything related to personality traits.


  3. @Boc, thanks for the tip and letting me know. They look normal from the comps I view the blog from.

    @Decci, same here about the personality traits. At least for me, what they say about mine is mostly true (well, at least the positive ones!) haha..


  4. i was just as skeptical of astrology, for the same reasons. it wasn’t science. it was for weirdos and hippies. so my neighbor and friend at the time, who cut my hair, and who, ironically, convinced me to grow out my hair for the first time since childhood, asked if she could do my ‘natal chart,’ which, essentially, was her telling me about my past. so i agreed. and she did it and knew all about my past. freaked me out. i allowed that this astrology thing might have some merit.

    hey, you live and learn. as my dad used to say, let the evidence lead your beliefs.

    didn’t know that about pope john paul 1. very interesting. sounds like the typical reaction of an entrenched human organization that is, as martin luther king said, more of a taillight than a headlight.


    • Many dismiss it but people should give it a chance. It’s really fascinating (not the ‘daily horoscopes’, of course).

      It’s a shame the Pope died so early. There’s more to the book/story.


  5. This is really useful post for me. I stumbled onto your blog and read a few posts. I like your style of writing.


  6. Earthianne, I am so enjoying your posts. You are really touching a nerve with me on ‘Losing my Religion’. It really does make you wonder. Now look at the Catholic Church… they have a lot to answer for.


    • I’m glad you’re (still) enjoying reading my posts, Niamh. Read my next one (part 4, perhaps in the next 2 weeks). I’m not confident you’ll like the last instalment (part 5) but it’s the big one for me and my main reason.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: